e.Digital has won back it's full right of issues it had stated its first campaign on.

All other claims aside having their respective importance of FlashR....the issue of implementing and managing flash the way they do is the most important part of FlashR. That is what is being resolved now.

They are approaching a milestone that will eventually pan out for e.Digital in representing FlashR in the way it was to be first considered. The Past comes to life...for all commentary of e.Digital regarding FlashR.

FlashR becomes relevant, where the news they sit on of new IP issues becomes more relevant.

Had they release news of new issues prior, other than what they have, .... it would be considered totally irrelevant....and that is what has happened to that type news...basically.."so what"

How would one expect to balance such things, I say it's being done in the right manner....

Does any one here feel that e.Digital has not won back its respect regarding prior IP?

When I listen to emit, and his "one thin dime" comment, he feels it has not.

With that, why would emit believe anything that e.Digital might say without getting FlashR resolved...as nothing more than.... "so what"?

I do understand frustration , I do not understand emits.

doni