Free
Message: e.Digital Corporation v. Micron - REPLY to Response to Motion

Re Micron docket... for Micron Consumer Products Group, Inc.

"Further, Defendants served amended invalidity contentions, as they were

entitled to as a matter of right, on December 29, 2014. Id. at 10:5-7. Defendants

then filed their petition a mere two days later, on December 31, 2014. Thus,

viewing the entirety of the facts, Defendants’ timing to file the IPR petition was

more than reasonable."

No filing, that I can see of that nature, for December 29, 2014...I see Answer to AmendedComplaint on 6-12-14

Must have been a non offical filing Amending their answer to e.Digitals amended complaint?

==================================

Considering the above: e.Digital filed its amended complaint 3-21-14; defendant ansered the amended complaint 6-12-14 or 52 days later; defendant then files amended invalidity contentions, as they were entitled to as a matter of right, on December 29, 2014...or 5.5 months later ...to coinside with a 12-31-14 USPTO/IPR petition...and a motion for stay 1-7-15.

5.5 months to amend invalidity contentions? I do not see the formality filed?

"as a matter of right"...,Come on lets get this over with..e.Digital has rights as well, and Micron is not timely.

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply