Free
Message: Re: e.Digital Corporation v. Eye−Fi ~ Joint motion to dismiss

I'm confused as to how us winning 'all asserted claims' per CC affects this; chances are those on the docket now are held to claim 1, but thinking now we can revisit all those in the past that were not confronted with 108, only we can assert all 108s claims 1,2,5. And that does point back at very similar issues of 774, practically everything except removable aspects. And now they are stored-up as to be super fundemental; primary-mem/ram/microprocessor/encasement/circuitry/buttons/duo-mics.

''Additional Lawsuits Filed: In early December 2013, the Company filed numerous additional lawsuits against manufacturers and suppliers of Flash memory storage devices. These devices include various types of Flash cards, SSD drives and USB thumb drives. The Company believes the defendants are infringing claim one of the Company’s U.S. Patent No. 5,839,108 (“the ‘108 patent).Claim one of the ‘108 patent was not affected by last year’s collateral estoppel ruling, which the Company is currently challenging through an appeal it filed with the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. There are currently 40 active cases in this latest round of litigation. ''

http://www.edigital.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=132:edigital-reports-third-quarter-results&catid=:news

Who should we go to trial with?

Who should just buy us and 'have their way with it'?

RP stated $21 long long time ago.

Our luck we get reasonable offer n edig rejext it on future Nu/MS prospects.

e

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply