I'm dense, but not that thick... I understand after seeing the link doni provided yesterday per apple. This post confused me seeing Apple mentioned with 108:

http://agoracom.com/ir/edigital/forums/discussion/topics/627739-opinion-appeal-out-108-reversed/messages/1968462#message

“e.Digital brought suit against Woodman Labs, Inc. d/b/a GoPro (GoPro), Pantech Wireless, Inc. and Pantech Co. Ltd. (together, Pantech), Futurewei Technologies, Inc. and Huawei Device USA (together, Huawei), and Apple Inc. in the Southern District of California, asserting reexamined claim 33 and claims 2 and 5 of the '108 pa-tent. The court consolidated GoPro and Pantech's cases for discovery and claim construction purposes only. Based on the Colorado Court's previous construction, the de­fendants moved to apply collateral estoppel to the con­struction of the sole memory limitation in the '774 and '108 patents''

This post mine today shoulda been written -

''iPhone 4 / iPhone 5 has 3.

Will we revisit them all that were in the first round, there's a bunch -

How would we ever know if we've done settled with them on the aspect of 108 pertaining to the mics.''

http://agoracom.com/ir/edigital/forums/discussion/topics/627842-you-had-me-at-two-microphones/messages/1968796#message

fwiw

e