Re: Re Sanctions

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

doni

Rank: President [?]

Points: 76204 [?]

Votes: 138 Score: 3.3 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: Re Sanctions

in response to

Re Sanctions

sman998

posted on Oct 03, 2014 03:15PM

sman...

" If the pleading is withdrawn [or dismissed], the motion for sanctions may not be filed with the court." [Citation.] If the pleading is not withdrawn, the motion for sanctions may then be filed. (Ibid.)" (Levy v. Blum (2001) 92 Cal. App. 4th 625, 637.)"

with that...the mechanism is fine, however...

(19) The statement made in “

Defendant Toshiba America Information

Systems, Inc.’s [Proposed] Order Granting Defendant Toshiba America

Information Systems, Inc.’s Motion for Sanctio

==========================================

There was a dismissal of the case.... the motion for sanction was proposed...where the mechanism noted above would simply have kicked in, does the judge have the right to comment on the proposal after the fact, with written comments added to order of dismissal?