Free
Message: Re: The message should be clear./edited
20
Jul 03, 2014 10:02AM
7
vic
Jul 03, 2014 11:02AM
16
Jul 03, 2014 11:28AM
4
vic
Jul 03, 2014 11:33AM
6
Jul 03, 2014 11:54AM
7
Jul 03, 2014 11:56AM
2
Jul 03, 2014 12:07PM
10
Jul 03, 2014 12:13PM
1
vic
Jul 03, 2014 03:48PM

doni - Back then I don't think anybody really cared about standards, as we see now, it was one for all n all for one. The left foot didn't know what right foot was doing at neither edigital/intel or ti... we got quashed in our efforts n ti made-out like bandits.

Now per Nuchie not coming about if standards were established, that would depend on how much nunchi relies on microOS imo... I thought the encription patent mighta been the key-link but oviously not; sure nunchi is a communications patent/s, in-amongst itself but has jumped the relm of flash memory into algorthims which will only make the courts rulings more ambigiuos for everyone involved.

And don't we know Qualcomm/broadcom/STM/frescale/etc, are next to be named.

I'm looking forward to a MicroSignet PR by Sep - n appeal verdict

imo

e

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply