Re: Pacer:Court of Appeals-granting EDIG motion to extend time to file reply brief
posted on
Jun 13, 2014 03:56PM
lets get that into a better prospective ...
=================================================
06/12/2014 43
The previously filed brief filed by Appellees Pantech Wireless, Inc. and Pantech Co. Ltd. in 14-1239 [39] is withdrawn. [160831]
==================================================
06/12/2014 46
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file reply brief [42] filed by Appellant e.Digital Corporation. Reply brief is due 07/03/2014. Service: 06/12/2014 by clerk. [160902]
|
=====================================================
Pantech killed its 39 brief with 43 , Pantech filed 39 brief prior to e.Digital filing its 42 brief (?)...of which e.Digital must have read 39....then e.Digital motioned for additional time to file 42(granted with 46 ) which the defendant must have read thereby killing its 39 with 43...
lol
some day it ends
doni