Free
Message: survey vote count now at

You are correct, that's what Fred said on Aug 29.

Then on Oct 18 the USPTO sent out the non final rejection per below.

microSignet patent issued officially Oct 29.

IMO, with this chain of events, the patent app was no longer important, so EDIG chose not to respond. Fred said to Nunally, "FOGETTABOUTIT"

Also at the Nov 19, 2009 SHM, it was stated to a question from the floor asking if this patent app attemp was very important, as in was it a valuable asset if approved...the answer was "not really."

IMO, EDIG/DM went thru the motions until the non final hit, there was too much to overcome, microSignet had already received the nod Oct 9, for publication Oct 29.

As I see things, it was no longer worth pursuing regarding cost to continue the fight vs the assumed return if approved.

Bottom line, ROI was a negative number.

10-18-2013 CTNF Non-Final Rejection PROSECUTION 11
10-18-2013 892 List of references cited by examiner PROSECUTION 6
10-18-2013 SRFW Search information including classification, databases and other search related notes PROSECUTION 1
10-18-2013 SRNT Examiner's search strategy and results PROSECUTION 8
10-18-2013 FWCLM Index of Claims PROSECUTION

1

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply