Pacer: e.DIGITAL & Lite-On IT Corporation reached settlement aggreement !
in response to
by
Message: Pacer: e.DIGITAL & Lite-On IT Corporation reached settlement aggreement !
Fax: 619.696.0323 Attorneys for Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA e.Digital Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Lite-On IT Corporation; and, Lite-On Sales And Distribution Inc., Defendants. Case No. 3:14-cv-00092-H-BGS PLAINTIFF E.DIGITAL CORPORATION’S NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND
UNOPPOSED EX PARTE
MOTION TO STAY ALL
DEADLINES PENDING
SETTLEMENT
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Assigned to the Honorable
Judge Marilyn L. Huff
Courtroom 15A (Annex)
TO THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the aforementioned matter known as
e.Digital Corporation v. Lite-On IT Corporation, Case Number 3:14-cv-00092-HBGS,
has been settled. Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Lite-On IT Corporation; and, Lite-On Sales And Distribution Inc. (collectively referred to hereafter as “Lite-On” or “Defendants”) have reached an agreement in principal for
settlement of the above-captioned matter and are in the process of finalizing their
settlement agreement.
Plaintiff anticipates filing a notice of voluntary dismissal of this action as to
the Defendants no later than April 28, 2014. None of the Defendants have
appeared or otherwise responded to the Complaint in this matter to date.
In light of the foregoing, Plaintiff further makes the following unopposed ex
parte motion seeking:
1) An order from the Court staying all deadlines in this matter up to and
including April 28, 2014, by which date the parties expect to have executed a
settlement agreement and it is anticipated that Plaintiff will file a notice of
voluntary dismissal of the case.
This limited stay of deadlines, which the Defendants have represented they
do not oppose, is for good cause and so that justice may be served. Plaintiff does
not submit this request to the Court for purposes of delay, but rather so that the
parties may have time to finalize a written settlement agreement and dismiss this
matter forthwith in its entirety.
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.2, the parties hereto will separately submit a
Proposed Order granting the relief requested.
Dated: March 19, 2014
HANDAL & ASSOCIATES
By: /s/Pamela C. Chalk
Anton N. Handal
Pamela C. Chalk
Gabriel G. Hedrick.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
e.Digital Corporation
18 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
16
Mar 21, 2014 11:03AM
10
Mar 21, 2014 11:07AM
5
Mar 21, 2014 01:14PM
5
Mar 21, 2014 01:37PM
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply