Re: Strong response by e.DIGITAL in court of appeals document
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 02, 2014 11:59AM
While it is true that the prosecution history of the “108 patent contains a reference to the “774 patent as an example of prior art, this is not sufficient to find that the patent are so interralted that collateral Estoppel should apply.
And that has been pointed out on this board...many times. 108 and 774 are separate entities.
doni