I'm having trouble understanding if 108 stands alone in the Colorado ruling or at the hip of 737. If it stands on it's own, the Intel suit, in theory, should proceed ahead without any reference to 737. How did our trial judge get 108 into CE? Does this seem confusing to anyone else? What am I missing, or did I forget what I'm talking about? Am I just mixing up 737 and 734? Fuzzy-wazzy!
ORY