Thing is, e.Digital did not initiate the re-exam of 10-27-10 and the defendant that did, did for its own reasons. The CO court ruled on the sole memory issue earlier 6-28-10 and that issue then became unimportant to the defendant that incited the re-exam.

And if you consider what was on the defendants mind to initiate as it did ....what would you consider?

For me, they were looking to significantly change 774....If e.Digital had iniciated on its matter at hand .....the sole memory issue....nothing would have significantly changed.....just a designation to a sketch.

They are all trying to screw us into the ground.....and they know exactly what e.Digital is all about technically and I'm not counting NUNCHI or Signet in that thought.

doni