Free
Message: Re: David v. Goliath - Handal opposition response to Apple motion ( 1 )

e.Digital Corporation (“e.Digital”) has asserted that Apple infringes various claims of e.Digital’s U.S. Patent Nos. 5,491,774 (“the ’774 patent”); 5,839,108 (“the ’108 patent”); 5,742,737 (“the ’737 patent”); 5,842,170 (“the ’170 patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”). Similar claims were asserted against the"

Here's the complaint doc's against Apple:

04/01/2013 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Apple Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0974-5762467.), filed by e.Digital Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E)

The new case number is 3:13-cv-00785-MMA-BLM. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Chalk, Pamela)(notified CA of related cases on cover sheet)(cxl) (cap). (Entered: 04/02/2013)

04/01/2013 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *5,842,170*, *5,742,737*, *5,491,774* cc:USPTO (cxl) (cap). (Entered: 04/02/2013)


I do not see 108 in the determination....I do not see any issues on the docket that might chang that consideration.

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply