Free
Message: ironic

"8. Accordingly, the Court hereby enters this Final Judgment as follows: a) Judgment in favor of Huawei on e.Digital’s claims for infringement of claims 33 and 34 of the ’774 patent, claims 2 and 5 of the ’108 patent, and any other claims depending therefrom (Dkt# 1) as a result of the application of the Collateral Estoppel Order."

RE: Final judgement doc 73

As I noted earlier, I have questions regarding the above....mainly the final judgment

Is it with prejudice or without prejudice ?....the judge is not saying and the joint motion request for this judgment did not say.

IMO, this judgment is without prejudice....and is the first settlement that actually has a dis-positive consideration against e.Digital and 774 CE issue....all the other defendants, thus far, have a partial judgment of without prejudice...not being totally dis-positive to e.Digital.

This dis-positive judgment (doc 73)regarding 774 is now filed as exhibit A for the appeals process of CE along with exhibit B (CE ruling doc 64)

I'm still standing by my consideration that e.Digital is not going after Huawei after the appeals process...IMO, they are just utilizing the dis-positive issue, which must have been a necessarity to get the ball rolling on the appeal. In any event, things are rolling and we shall see how it all comes into play.

IMO, as I anticipate, the other defendants come to the table and settle up having the appeal in thier thoughts..

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply