You seem to like to say "we all have 3 choices", and it is true, however you must include the past 15-20 years in the analysis. Tell that to the over twenty investors who are probably in the red, some big time, based on past company comments including non existent PRs on the desk.

Tell that to the past inivestors who kept this company afloat for the past 15 years, while the accumulated deficit is approximately 80 million dollars.

Do you think they are happy about probably selling way below their acquired share price?

What good does it do for us to expound on our past patent achievements and showing no substantial revenue from the technology. We should be telling the world about our developments, their applications and the potential future source of income, without violating nondisclosure agreements.

Granted, we are in probably in the best situation compared to the past several years, but we expect changes from the past, no matter what they have to do to bring about substantial income. Lets reward the 20+ thousand shareholders for their support over the years. Put the foot on the gas pedal.