Though that term may be a correct way of easily depicting, I question the application of the word "low". Infringement is infringement. The scope of infringement was probably narrowed to a degree, but I suspect the bulk of product still infringes another aspect of the patent portfolio.

Thus, my preferred way of characterizing what I'm suggesting (in ignorance) is a "High/Less High" agreement. I say this somewhat tongue-in-cheek since I have no idea how much the scope of infringement may have changed, or how much that impacts the license fee.

I KNOW nuttin'! Just optimistically suspicious!

SGE