This is the PTO examiner telling Judge Krieger, "Ma'am, you stick to punishing jaywalkers and we'll handle the technical aspects of US patents." LOL

From EDIG v APPLE Doc 34:

Having been shown the above-referenced figures in person and as part of e.Digital’s office action response, and with knowledge of Judge Krieger’s claim construction order, the PTO allowed the amendment of the independent claims of the ’774 patent to incorporate, among other things, the addition of the microprocessor of Fig. 5 shown above. (See Exhibit 3 to Hedrick Decl. at 3:3.) A person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention, having the benefit of reviewing the amended claims and the prosecution history containing the above referenced figures, would therefore clearly understand that the invention of amended claims 33 and 34 requires the presence of RAM to support, among other things, microprocessor applications; a conclusion that contradicts that reached by Judge Krieger.