Message: Hmmm..
DOLPHINS 1 , First i want to thank you for the posting e.DIGITAL v. Sandisk case.As you know Jonesday legal firm are one of the top prestigious intellectual propertyrepresentative and they will fight tooth and nail for this case .But as you said i believe from the wording "insufficient knowledge" and more than 30 days for response , there isa good expectation for this sufficient time to negotiate for settlement .JMHO
please see the highlighted paragraphs .
A defendant's first pleading in a case, which addresses the dispute on the merits and presents any defenses and
A defendant's written response to a plaintiff's initial court filing (called a complaint or petition). An answer normally denies some or all of the facts asserted by the complaint, and sometimes seeks to turn the tables on the plaintiff by making allegations or charges against the plaintiff (called counterclaims) or providing justification for the defendant's behavior (called affirmative defenses). Normally a defendant has 30 days in which to file an answer after being served with the plaintiff's complaint. In some courts, an answer is called a "response."
When a party alleges he/she is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of an aspect of the complaint, the answer shall be deemed noncontesting to the allegation of the complaint to which it responds. R. 4:64-1(a)(3).
21 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply