As for the examiner determinations... for the most part, sitings of the prior art instances and defining where and why claims are determined to be un-patentable.

There is one description identified at the beginning of determinations that was also objectionable and needing tweaking...examiner giving suggestion to tweak.

In any event, I don't know how important to e.Digital an imaging and referencing consideration would be....described as augmented reality....I'd say not much.

With that, we now see(me anyway)how hard it's going to be noting the problems of Qualcomm trying to bring the periphery together for this image package. Basically what they tried to pull together, according to examiner, has already been done, or is being done and applied for. Some of that prior art is 2012 applications.

Anyway, e.Digital now has published patents for its involved efforts.

doni