Free
Message: Re: IMO -
6
Jan 24, 2013 06:33PM
2
Jan 24, 2013 06:38PM
3
Jan 24, 2013 06:51PM
2
Jan 24, 2013 06:58PM
10
Jan 24, 2013 07:06PM
5
Jan 24, 2013 07:08PM
6
Jan 24, 2013 07:17PM
8
Jan 24, 2013 07:34PM
3
Jan 24, 2013 07:47PM
3
Jan 24, 2013 07:55PM
3
Jan 24, 2013 08:34PM
6
Jan 25, 2013 08:44AM
7
Jan 25, 2013 12:31PM
7
Jan 25, 2013 02:33PM
2
Jan 25, 2013 02:57PM
5
Jan 25, 2013 10:18PM
2
Jan 25, 2013 11:59PM
2
Jan 26, 2013 08:13AM
9
Jan 26, 2013 09:04AM
15
Jan 26, 2013 10:01AM

My original question/concern:

''wish they'd show us something to make it a little clearer to us and the world''

your response:

''The only ingredient we are waiting on, with regard to NUNCHI... are clients that will implement e.Digitals back bone and can absorb the data.''

mine again:

Show us/tell us a little more about this 'back-bone.' So far we've seen nothing but a lot of hyperbola based on spectacular claims within several new unsubstantiated trade-marks and patents. Also it'd have to be within the device because the current patents ref wifi/bluetooth; I see nothing yet putting this back-bone on the telecom frequencies.

Not complaining just explaining, like - Make it so Obi Whan Kenobi

If they are showing parts of this back-bone to clients we're sitting ourselves up to travel the same-ol infriengment path again after others take-off with spinnoffs/work-arounds of our original idea once again.

I/we just need lil news

e

6
Jan 26, 2013 06:28PM
6
Jan 26, 2013 06:59PM
2
Jan 26, 2013 07:12PM
2
Jan 26, 2013 07:43PM
1
Jan 26, 2013 07:52PM
1
Jan 26, 2013 07:59PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply