woodman extension
posted on
Dec 20, 2012 10:55AM
woodman, all defendants except buy.com request extension:
BASIS FOR EXTENSION REQUEST
Given that all of the Defendants (except for Buy.com, Inc.) anticipate and/or are going to
be represented by the same counsel in this matter, it may conserve judicial resources if the time
for all the Defendants to respond to the Complaint is similarly extended to the same date.
As it currently stands now, all of the Defendants who have been served and/or have
waived service of the summons have different response deadlines with respect to the Complaint
that vary from December 31, 2012 to January 2, 2013.
Case 3:12-cv-02899-CAB-WVG Document 15 Filed 12/19/12 Page 2 of 5JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 3:12-CV-02899-CAB-WVG
-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HANDAL & ASSOCIATES
1200 THIRD AVE
SUITE 1321
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
TEL: 619.544.6400
FAX: 619.696.0323
Additionally, to date, counsel for the Defendants to this motion has indicated a possible
willingness to discuss settlement of this matter. If a resolution can be reached in this matter, most
likely such a resolution would be a global resolution that would resolve this case in its entirety as
to all the parties. Accordingly, the parties need time to determine whether this matter can be
settled. The parties to this Motion thereby wish to have an opportunity to discuss possible
resolution of this matter and need time to do so. Further, some of the Defendants’ response to
the Complaint are due at or during the holiday season when counsel for both sides and/or