redefined?? I've stated that ?

Emit, the sole-memory issue involves other details beyond just stating "sole-memory needs to be redefined....the word is fine in itself.

I've stated that it fits the description with the details as I see things....

Part of the sole memory detail was the Colorado defendants construction...

Part 2 of the defendants construction:

"(2) sole memory of the received processed sound electrical signals: “the only memory of the received processed sound electrical signals, without another memory system such as RAM”

The RAM issue regarding the defendants construction has been resolved...RAM is now front and center with the 774 re-exam.

The re-exam lifts the considered implicit involvement of RAM and makes it explicit.

And the Markman issue leaning on that issue is worthless.

doni