on the prosecution record....

Phone call agreement....

"Description of the general nature of what was agreed to if an agreement was reached, or any other comments:

The amendments to the independent claims 1 and 19 will affect the scope of the dependent claims 6-17 and 20-22, which were not subject to reexamination.

Agreed that the Examiner is authorized to do an Examiner's amendment for rewritting the amended base claims 1 and 19 as new base claims 33 and 34, respectively, and for amendinq the dependent claims 2-5, 18, and 23-32 as appropriate in accordance with 37 CFR 1.530 and MPEP 2260.01 for placing the application in condition for issuing a NIRC."

==============================================================

reference: 

dependent claims 6-17 and 20-22 can be referenced to 33 and 34 through the above prosecution agreement.

"claims 2-5, 18, and 23-32"

amended: pointers...

"Regarding dependent claims 2-5, 18, and 23-32, each is patentable because of its dependency, either directly or indirectly, to the corresponding patentable new independent claim 33"

For the most part...changes to the old are miniscule...with claim 2 having a pointer to claim 33. As a result of that claims 3,4,5 change by default and have no physical changes. Claim 18 changes with a pointer to claim 33.

Everything else is NEW

doni