1st, we gather from the PR & 8-K wording we are not appealing the 774, but amending claim language in order for the examiner to accept/revalidate with changes.

Not sure where we are at yet with 737, but it seems less likely to have as many issues as 774 did, based on the defendants claims at Markman, yet the court never ruled on 737 anyway.

My understanding (not knowledgable) is 737 was an extention of 774, an add on patent.

As to your other question, I yield vs guess.

The goal here in simple terms, is not to fight to the death by demanding this claim and that claim stand as is, but use compromise language where needed and take what we can get.

My generic take...