"Agreement reached!!"

maybe...

"(A fuller description, if necessary, and a copy of the amendments which the examiner agreed would render the claims patentable, if available, must be attached. Also, where no copy of the amendments that would render the claims patentable is available, a summary thereof must be attached.)"

"Continuation of Description of the general nature of what was agreed to if an agreement was reached, or any other comments:

Inventor Norris demonstrated how to use the device for performing the record and playback a short voice message.

Mr. Gurries explained how the circuits of Figs. 4, 5, 6A and 6B are arranged and operated for supplying the required voltages to different elements of the device and for providing power management controls.

Examiner Tran contended that the rejections of claims 1-5, 18 and 19, as recited in the last Office action mailed 09/20/2011, are maintained because the above-identified prior art teaches each and every claimed elements and limitations recited in the claims; particularly, the limitation "a power source coupled to the control circuitry for supplying electrical power to the device", as recited in each of the base claims 1 and 19, comprises functional language, which requires no specific "coupling", and/or no specific structural arrangement.

Agreed that a formal written response to the last Office action will be submitted to the Office for consideration."

We wait for.... "A fuller description, if necessary, and a copy of the amendments which the examiner agreed would render the claims patentable,

doni