I just disagree with your analysis. We look at plans, goals, financial information, and achievements differently.

I'm focused on actual achievements, and I guess by your analysis the entire investment market is wrong because they focus on quarterly results.

This process started about 5 years ago, so saying they are a start up company is not accurate. By your definition every time they go through a down period and then have a good quarter or two, it shows growth and a new sign of life.

What would you say to your engineering group if no new products were introduced into the market in the last five years. And the enchanced EVU project should have never been started. They made a mistake in evaluating the market several years ago and failed to understand how it was going to change.

One might ask if they analyzed the market about what they wanted with respect to the engineering effort being put into the nunchi project. Many products have failed as a result of not finding out what the market wanted.