Free
Message: Time & Sales - Friday 10/21/2011 Vol 200,390 Closed at .029

"The article appears to be his main reason for rejecting the claims. I just can't figure out who pointed out that article to him, or if he found it on his own."

For the device captioned in the article, is it capable of both issues(claim 1 and 19) that 774 is patented under?

IMO, that is where the issues will be decided.

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply