yet an obvious reason why the defendants would not initiate a summary judgement.....

"With respect to the Defendants identified in Exhibit B, e.Digital contends that additional discovery from those Defendants is necessary for e.Digital to determine whether a stipulation of non-infringement is appropriate. Accordingly, e.Digital proposes that it be permitted to take limited discovery of those Defendants identified in Exhibit B (in the form of obtaining additional documents and/or sworn declarations or depositions) confirming that each of the accused products use “RAM or any other memory system, while engaging the CODEC, DSP (as applicable), and memory control functions, [or] storing the fully-manipulated data.” See Order at p. 16."

What gives e.Digital the right to ask that of the court? They have the right, because the judge opinion-ed for the analog issues of the patent....and e.Digital has, or should have the right to investigate with regard to that condition.

The defendants have to provide the circumstances of their RAM issues.

flip-flop

doni