Re: somebody better say something fast
in response to
by
posted on
Jun 29, 2011 12:06PM
I have to disagree that Doc 395, "Opinion and Order Regarding Claim Construction", is not a ruling. The judge issued a claim construction on the phrase, "a flash memory module which operates as sole memory of the received processed sound electrical signals". That was the only claim she construed however, choosing to not rule on the other 7 claims. She has now given 30 days for the parties to figure out the way ahead.
No new PACERs this morning.
FWIW, I still have all of my shares as well.
06/28/2011 | 395 |
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 6/28/11. (msksec, ) (Entered: 06/28/2011) |
06/28/2011 | 396 |
NOTICE To Terminate Electronic Service by Defendants Hoya Corporation, Hoya Corporation USA, Pentax of America, Inc. (Pflug, Ashlea) (Entered: 06/28/2011) |
06/28/2011 | 397 | Party Leica Camera, Inc., Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, terminated pursuant to the notice of dismissal or stipulation to dismiss filed in this case on 06/28/2011. Text only entry - no document attached. (wjc, ) (Entered: 06/29/2011) |