tier 1 vs. 2 ?

Whatever ability is ventured for FlashR.....some form of source code is considered at settlement, I remember a comment of RP to that effect. Where if there's a tier 1 and 2 plan, that source code would have to be limited.

As far as the type companies named, where the verbiage "low hanging" might indicate a tier process ....it's been pretty much a mixed bag at this point.

My thought, past and present, for FlashR, ....the " R" would not carry a broad a meaning....like removable or "E" embedded.....technically the usage methods would be similar or the same.
If you give full ability with Flash R.....read and write (or the full I/O) can they stop a defendant from utilizing that I/O at the embedded environment?

I do not see a clear line between the two, removable vs. embedded, and why they settled on R ?
Will FlashR, having a meaning "removable", cover embedded issues?

I don't see how they can differentiate with an R and keep the two environments separate.

FWIW
doni