What exactly do you strongly disagree with, my suggestion that this supposed shareholder call the company to get the answers he felt were lacking at the meeting, or was it that he share his answers with other investors in an open forum?

I never said John`s questions were not pertinent. However, this was not John`s personal meeting with management and I felt he had a fair amount of pertinent questions asked. There are an endless amount of questions people could raise about past issues and while that may be the pound of flesh some are looking for, this shareholder prefers to focus on what will bring us revenues next quarter and the quarter beyond that.

Management is accessible to all shareholders via a simple telephone call. I suspect John could still be there asking questions.

Did they need to run it by the great and powerful oz to call an end to the meeting?

This line of discussion is ridiculous.