Free
Message: : Another look at excerpts from Doc #303 before coming Markman ruling(2)
13
May 13, 2011 08:36PM
5
May 13, 2011 08:52PM
4
May 13, 2011 09:12PM
5
May 13, 2011 09:47PM
15
May 14, 2011 09:18AM
3
May 14, 2011 10:35AM
4
May 14, 2011 11:24AM
4
May 14, 2011 11:42AM

Re Flash memory is the " SOLE MEMORY " & RAM

Likewise, it is clear that the Examiner understood Applicant’s references to main
memory as storage memory as evidenced by her statement in the Examiner Interview Summary:
“the flash memory is the sole memory to store the received processed sound electrical signal.”
(See Examiner Interview Summary Record dated July 17, 1995, attached as Exhibit B to Exh. 4
(Norris Decl.)). The Examiner’s statement conveys the understanding that the flash memory is
the sole memory that stores the already received and processed sound electrical signals; as
opposed to the sole memory for both processing and storage. If the Patent Examiner agreed with
Defendants that flash memory was used in lieu of RAM to process the audio data, the proposed
amendment would not have referred to “received processed sound electrical signal.” In short,
Defendants’ interpretation of “main memory” as RAM memory for processing data simply cannot be reconciled with this written statement by the Examiner, and even if ,
accepted Defendants’ argument creates a claim construction dispute within a claim construction dispute,
i.e., what does main memory mean in the context of the ‘774 Patent?
(Excerpts from Doc 303)
9
May 14, 2011 02:32PM
14
May 14, 2011 02:43PM
10
May 14, 2011 03:28PM
1
May 14, 2011 04:41PM
1
May 14, 2011 04:41PM
21
May 14, 2011 06:41PM

May 14, 2011 09:01PM
5
May 14, 2011 09:36PM
4
May 14, 2011 10:46PM
4
May 14, 2011 10:49PM
14
May 15, 2011 09:08AM
4
May 15, 2011 10:14AM
11
May 15, 2011 03:28PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply