as was the case with ptsc's Markman decision below.

http://infringement.blogs.com/philip_brooks_patent_infr/2007/06/patriot_scienti.html

V. Conclusion

The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the ‘336 patent, the ‘148 patent, and the ‘584 patent. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each other’s claim construction positions in the presence of the jury. Likewise, the parties are ordered to refrain from mentioning any portion of this opinion, other than the actual definitions adopted by the Court, in the presence of the jury. Any reference to claim construction proceedings is limited to informing the jury of the definitions adopted by the Court.

Attached is the full ruling for the details of the Court's construction of each of the disputed claims (Download markman_hearing_ruling_on_6152007.doc).