Free
Message: Re: May of 2006 "774" Bankerson/Bankerson....
8
Apr 05, 2011 11:36PM
1
Apr 05, 2011 11:49PM
9
Apr 06, 2011 12:44AM
4
Apr 06, 2011 12:59AM
8
Apr 06, 2011 02:06AM
12
Apr 06, 2011 08:32AM
5
Apr 06, 2011 10:21AM
3
Apr 06, 2011 10:25AM
5
Apr 06, 2011 12:13PM
18
Apr 06, 2011 04:25PM
4
Apr 06, 2011 05:11PM
16
Apr 06, 2011 08:05PM
5
Apr 06, 2011 10:10PM
14
Apr 06, 2011 10:40PM
5
Apr 07, 2011 01:38AM
11
Apr 07, 2011 05:22AM
9
Apr 07, 2011 08:34AM
7
Apr 07, 2011 09:27AM
7
Apr 07, 2011 09:43AM
2
Apr 07, 2011 10:06AM
7
Apr 07, 2011 10:20AM
6
Apr 07, 2011 11:40AM
3
Apr 07, 2011 12:07PM
2
Apr 07, 2011 01:00PM
3
Apr 07, 2011 01:23PM
9
Apr 07, 2011 01:31PM

That is the most clear and understandable analogy I have read on this board to make everyone understand , ( I hope), that our focus should be on what lies ahead, and rehashing of the past is counterproductive at best...

We have been on this voyage together for over a decade. We know the past, and we know edig is hovering at $.08-.10 CENTS...

The pps shall not be affected one way or another by our discovering which patent is more important than the other. The case is in the hands of the Lawyers and they have done their part...

NOW, WE WAIT UNTIL JUDGE KRIEGER HAS SPOKEN. THAT IS WHEN WE SEE MOVEMENT IN THE PPS, ONE WAY OR THE OTHER...

In the meantime PLAY NICE, or go read a book...

GLTA...

Gil...

3
Apr 07, 2011 02:06PM
4
Apr 07, 2011 02:16PM
2
Apr 07, 2011 03:11PM
13
Apr 07, 2011 03:32PM
1
Apr 07, 2011 04:30PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply