Free
Message: Re: that's exactly what Minister posted.."NOW WE KNOW WHY THEY CHOSE CO" ..GIL
5
Feb 01, 2011 09:56AM
3
Feb 01, 2011 11:11AM
5
Feb 01, 2011 11:52AM
5
Feb 01, 2011 11:55AM
4
Feb 01, 2011 12:11PM
1
Feb 01, 2011 01:28PM
5
Feb 01, 2011 02:20PM
3
Feb 01, 2011 09:16PM
23
Feb 01, 2011 11:46PM
3
Feb 02, 2011 12:01AM
2
Feb 02, 2011 12:11AM
22
Feb 02, 2011 06:50AM
7
Feb 02, 2011 08:30AM
3
Feb 02, 2011 08:48AM
7
Feb 02, 2011 09:00AM
5
Feb 02, 2011 09:52AM
10
Feb 02, 2011 09:53AM
3
Feb 02, 2011 10:21AM

"The heart of the matter is, is it possible to target that particular judge for your case,?"...

The ANSWER is; It is NOT ONLY POSSIBLE, It is what distiguishes "Great Lawyering", from run of the mill legal representation... "

You cannot be serious. There are 11 District judges of which there are 5 senior. Dm may be able to look at the docket and other information, but as to thinking they would get a specific judge, I don't see it as a possibility, got ot be a matter of luck.

If not, please elaborate on the ingenuity and strategies DM may have used in shopping the judge.

She has had 116 IP cases of which 37 have been patent cases, according to the records available on Google.

9
Feb 02, 2011 02:58PM

Feb 02, 2011 03:10PM
8
Feb 02, 2011 03:25PM
2
Feb 02, 2011 03:51PM
6
Feb 02, 2011 04:32PM
6
Feb 02, 2011 05:10PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply