Looking good...

7. That Defendant Sakar has failed to offer any justification for its late objections to Plaintiff’s interrogatories. See Response (docket no. 343, at p. 4). Defendant Sakar does not offer any “good cause” to rebut the presumption that it waived its objections that were untimely. Under these facts, Defendant Sakar has not met its burden to fall within the exception to Rule 33(b)(4), and its untimely objections are waived; and