Free
Message: Re: PACER
21
Nov 09, 2010 08:49PM
14
Nov 09, 2010 08:56PM
13
Nov 09, 2010 08:59PM
13
Nov 09, 2010 09:01PM
11
Nov 09, 2010 09:05PM
13
Nov 09, 2010 09:08PM
5
Nov 09, 2010 09:28PM
2
Nov 09, 2010 09:43PM
5
Nov 09, 2010 11:57PM
5
Nov 10, 2010 12:21AM
12
Nov 10, 2010 08:06AM

So, the fact that there are 8 defendants not taking part in this motion leads me to believe they have other intentions or a different schedule they are going to propose. I doubt that the judge would entertain 2 schedules. If I were to speculate what their other intentions might be I would first suggest settlement. Nothing else comes to mind. Anyone else have a take?

Larry

11
Nov 10, 2010 12:27PM
7
Nov 10, 2010 01:18PM
6
Nov 10, 2010 01:36PM
13
Nov 10, 2010 02:11PM
5
Nov 10, 2010 02:20PM
4
Nov 10, 2010 02:58PM
3
Nov 10, 2010 03:51PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply