Free
Message: Re: Srilankan Order - DABOSS
4
Jul 02, 2010 12:05PM
2
Jul 02, 2010 12:09PM
13
Jul 03, 2010 03:39AM
1
Jul 03, 2010 09:25AM
6
Jul 03, 2010 09:43AM
12
Jul 06, 2010 01:53PM
5
Jul 06, 2010 03:12PM
10
Jul 06, 2010 03:44PM
3
Jul 06, 2010 08:34PM
18
Jul 06, 2010 11:40PM
10
Jul 07, 2010 09:55AM
3
Jul 07, 2010 03:31PM
3
Jul 07, 2010 03:47PM
9
Jul 07, 2010 03:53PM
4
Jul 07, 2010 04:01PM
5
Jul 07, 2010 04:09PM
6
Jul 07, 2010 04:54PM
2
Jul 07, 2010 05:09PM

I think you need to learn the new rules. It took me awhile but I get it now...

Whenever murgirl1 posts something that you or I (or anyone) might think is negative or perhaps even sarcastic, then we are obviously "reading into" her words far too much and thus creating phantom misconceptions from what PLAINLY was NEVER there at all.

However if you or I (or anyone) posts something which doesn’t quite sit so well with her, then we are clearly guilty of making evil INSINUATIONS. And HER judgement about what qualifies for either case is really quite flawless, mind you.

Oh, and if you or I (or anyone) posts anything, then she is absolutely within her rights (and may well be duty-bound) to post her R-E-P-L-I-E-S.

But now if we choose to reply to her, then we’re inevitably beating dead horses and just going on and on and on and on.

So to review... we post, she replies, then we shut up. Got it? Hope this helps.

- Sinkman

10
Jul 07, 2010 10:04PM
5
Jul 07, 2010 10:11PM
8
Jul 07, 2010 10:12PM
4
Jul 07, 2010 10:18PM
5
Jul 07, 2010 10:28PM
1
Jul 07, 2010 11:37PM
1
Jul 07, 2010 11:47PM
3
Jul 08, 2010 08:49AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply