So, it all comes down to...

Woodies past and current testimony, his exhibits.....and how they play out under...

"The Federal Circuit has consistently held that an inventor’s testimony regarding the
meaning of claim terms is irrelevant for purposes of claim construction."

The irrelevant consideration does not appear to be iron clad as I read it.

Amazing how all the road blocks are in place, or appear to be, including the testimony of the patent examiners.

Thanks Silver

doni