Free
Message: Re: PACER
13
Jun 26, 2010 11:39PM
3
Jun 27, 2010 12:19AM
2
Jun 27, 2010 02:03PM
6
Jun 27, 2010 03:38PM
1
Jun 27, 2010 03:50PM
1
Jun 27, 2010 04:30PM
3
Jun 27, 2010 05:24PM
4
Jun 27, 2010 06:41PM

RE: examiner

Though, the defendants might go the way of some form of dereliction of duty on her part.....I can see that shaping up.... wonder if shes following the case?

Wow, can you'll imagine if those papers are the examiners?

I have no idea why I have come to this conclusion.....could it be?

There is no way the defendants would want to hear from the examiner.....even though they hint they would like to....but alas, "because the Examiner is shielded from discovery as to his or her “bases, reasons, mental processes, analyses or conclusions.” she's out of the picture.

Maybe Woodie has her thoughts on a "voice recording" as well!!!

lol....

doni

1
Jun 27, 2010 07:17PM
3
Jun 28, 2010 01:13PM
3
Jun 28, 2010 01:16PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply