"I thought we determined vi RP that MOS could go within the array and work around bad blocks.."

They do... but, that has nothing to do with the post of mine you are reflecting upon.

Have you read 297? It's very apparent of what the defendants are focusing on.

It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't issue when the patents were first applied for. Even if you are very much doing things different than status quo. Some of you need to give Blunist the benefit of the doubt.

Very tricky stuff for sure.....the hero's should be Thorpe, North & Western, if they directed the patent prosecutions in the right manner.

A lot went into the initial process than most realize and it is very, very tricky in getting it right.

I see a double road block being put in place by the defendants....regarding the use of main memory and the meaning of it.

Has anyone else here read 297 and the defendants prospective on the issues?

doni