Free
Message: Oops, not all of it copied?

Oops, not all of it copied?

posted on Apr 13, 2010 11:33PM

the parties what they need” to engage in meaningful settlement discussions and litigate this case

most efficiently, without causing much delay in general discovery or the case schedule.

For these reasons, Defendants propose the following schedule for this case:

a. Initial Disclosures by Plaintiff due April 7:

In addition to the disclosures required by the Federal Rules, Plaintiff will provide:

(i) an identification of the accused products for each Defendant;

(ii) an identification of the asserted claims for each Defendant; and

(iii) Documents sufficient to show structure, operation and components of the

“Flashback Digital Recorder” referred to in the Amendment A of the

prosecution history of the ‘774 patent

b. Initial Disclosures by Defendants due April 7:

In addition to the disclosures required by the Federal Rules, Defendants will provide:

(i) Documents sufficient to show structure, operation and components of each of

the accused devices specifically identified by model name in the table of

products included in Plaintiff’s First Set of Requests for Production of

Documents to Defendants served on each of the Defendants. A Defendant may

provide exemplary documentation for groupings of accused product if it in

good faith believes it is appropriate to do so and it identifies the documentation

associated with a particular group of products.

c. April 15, 2010 – Parties exchange list of terms in asserted claims that parties believe

require construction, along with their proposed constructions;

d. April 29, 2010 – Deadline for parties to meet and confer in an effort to agree on

proposed constructions;

e. Supplemental Disclosures by Defendants due April 30:

(i) Documents sufficient to show structure, operation and components of each of

the products identified on the list provided by Plaintiff per disclosure (a)(i) for

which documentation was not provided on April 7. A Defendant may provide

exemplary documentation for groupings of accused product if it in good faith

believes it is appropriate to do so and it identifies the documentation associated

with a particular group of products.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply