Now the replies of e.Digital to the 3-26-2010 answers...it is interesting that Sakar has gone flat-line...

1. collectively referred to as “Pentax” ANSWER / COUNTERCLAIM 3-26-2010

2. collectively referred to as “Canon” ANSWER / COUNTERCLAIM 3-26-2010

3. referred to as “Coby” ANSWER / COUNTERCLAIM 7.1 DXG Technology Corporation, answer due 4/25/2010

4. collectively referred to as “DXG” ANSWER / COUNTERCLAIM 3-26-2010

5. collectively referred to as “HTC” ANSWER / COUNTERCLAIM 3-26-2010

6. referred to as “IKEGAMI” without prejudice

7. referred to as “Imation” ANSWER / COUNTERCLAIM 3-26-2010

8. collectively referred to as “Kyocera” ANSWER 3-26-2010

9. collectively referred to as “Leica” ANSWER / COUNTERCLAIM 3-26-2010

10. collectively referred to as “Marantz” ANSWER / COUNTERCLAIM 3-26-2010

11. collectively referred to as “Nokia” ANSWER 3-26-2010

12. collectively referred to as “Panasonic”. (see defendant 5 Sanyo) ANSWER / COUNTERCLAIM 3-26-2010

13. referred to as “Summit”. (“Polaroid”) answer due 4/12/2010

14. collectively referred to as “Roland” with prejudice

15. referred to as “Sakar” e.Digital ANSWER/REPLY 1-4-2010

16. referred to as “Samson” ANSWER 3-26-2010

17. referred to as “TEAC”(“Tascam”) ANSWER 3-26-2010

18. referred to as “VTECH”ANSWER / COUNTERCLAIM 3-26-2010

19. referred to as “WOLVERINE” without prejudice

Thanks Silver and jefother

doni