Re: Pacer
posted on
Feb 02, 2010 06:49PM
02/02/2010 | 175 | ORDER granting 171 Defendant Panasonic Corporation's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to 1 Complaint. Panasonic Corporation's answer due 3/29/2010, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/2/2010.(mjwcd ) (Entered: 02/02/2010) |
interesting...wow...no utility setting....he gave the 60 days of the Waver of Service....no one else got that....
Thing is, the following doc, was the doc he was setting up for the utility to follow.... note the highlight....IMO, he was going to set a different date.... and wham he gave the full 60 days considered in the Waver of service.
02/02/2010 | 174 |
Docket Annotation re: 173 Waiver of Service Executed. Modified on 2/2/2010 to edit text to clarify title of document and remove answer due date text. Text only entry - no document attached. (wjc, ) (Entered: 02/02/2010) |
The next furthest out is, 14. Kyocera Corporation, ..extending them from answer due 2/16/2010 off summons returned of 1-26-2010 (21 days), with an extension to answer complaint due 3/8/2010
20 day extension...total days to formally answer....41....as the others got
doni