Well that's interesting...I was expecting a normal summons returned from Panasonic Corporation ....seeing the first pacer filed they were looking for an extension.

Instead we get a WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned....with a 60 day time frame to answer, same as Nokia and HTC Corp.

I just recently commented RE: HTC Corp...

Recent HTC Corp pacer, similar to the Nokia Waiver of service.......60 days to answer.

I wounder if the court will inject a formal answer date as they did for Nokia with a "Docket Annotation; Utility Setting/Resetting Deadlines/" of 30 days to formally answer?

Nokia got an extension off that...I would say the same will happen For HTC Corp.

==========================================

Now pops up a MEMORANDUM regarding a time extension directly off the Panasonic Corporation Waiver...without a formal date set by the court utilizing "Docket Annotation" or "Utility setting".... to bounce the extension off of.

IMO, it's not going to bounce off the 60 days to answer date of 3-30-2010

doni