Free
Message: Re: PACER
7
Jan 19, 2010 10:32PM

Suh-weeeet! Looks like Nokia is in a settlement mood. Check out paragraph 4 from Doc 126. The usual reason I've seen when asking for an extension is due to the complexity of the case. I wonder how many other extension requests had this settlement language. I'll do some digging.

------------------

STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation (“e.Digital”) and Defendants Nokia Inc. and Nokia

Corporation (“Nokia”), by and through their counsel of record, respectfully move the Court for an extension of time for Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corporation to respond to e.Digital’s Complaint, and in support thereof state as follows:

1. Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corporation waived personal service of the Summons and Complaint on December 30, 2009, after being informed that e.Digital agreed to extend Nokia’s deadline for responding to the Complaint until February 15, 2010.

2. Nokia’s current deadline for responding to the Complaint is January 20, 2010.

3. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A, Nokia conferred with e.Digital’s counsel regarding obtaining an extension of time to respond to the Complaint. e.Digital has agreed to an extension of the response date to at least February 15, 2010.

4. Obtaining an extension of time would allow the parties to explore possibilities for settlement.

5. No extension of time has been requested or granted for Nokia prior to this motion.

WHEREFORE, e.Digital and Nokia respectfully request an extension of time until February 15, 2010 for Nokia to file its response to the Complaint.

5
Jan 19, 2010 11:54PM
3
Jan 20, 2010 12:03AM
5
Jan 20, 2010 12:10AM

Jan 20, 2010 07:27AM
5
Jan 20, 2010 09:04AM
1
Jan 20, 2010 09:13AM
1
Jan 20, 2010 09:41AM
2
Jan 20, 2010 10:08AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply