I'm not sure I know what transparency means anymore. I am quite clear on what the company is currently doing to generate revenues. It seems logical to keep the next round of infringers in the dark as they move into the next round of strategy to "raise the bar" against the next 19 infringers.

I am confident in DM as EDIG's legal counsel and we will see if EDIG can morph the next generation eVU into a product in demand for niche markets.

The big beef sits with the pps....which investors influence. The company appears focused on increasing shareholder value by either buying back shares, should they not appreciate appropriately, and/or proactively presenting EDIG as an investment vehicle to a targeted audience of potential investors. Those two fronts could go a long way to increase our value in this investment.

What will then drive the pps is whether or not current investors choose to buy, hold or sell based on those developments and further advancements with their business model.

From all accounts, company business will continue to further ramp up.