Re: Question / Pam
in response to
by
posted on
Nov 30, 2009 12:50PM
I doubt you will get an answer of any kind. Why should EDIG/DM show us their hole card?
IMO, Samsung either could not be provin to have infringed on more than two, or it was a bargining tool to drop two and obtain something else such as a cross licensing deal of some sort which the PR says they got, or a future partnership so "lets stay friendly" or a host of other items, thus I say you won't get a factual answer from me.
I think something I have learned is to keep expectations low. Kinda like when at a job, and the yearly review comes up, go into the meeting thinking "I will not be getting a raise this year" and when you get one anyway, it's happy time.
From now on I'm expecting zero dollars from future settlements...there...hahaha!!!