Thanks for asking the question.

Personally, I find Putnam's "non-answer" to the simple direct question on whether Samsung funds were booked very difficult to accept.

On 10/22/09 EDIG had clearance to announce the Company has reached " A Cross Licensing and Settlement Agreement with Samsung" and yet restriction remains which prevent EDIG from informing its shareholders on whether any or part of that settlement was included in a particular quarterly filing?

Why the ongoing evasiveness?

Wheels