At 10:46 A.M. on 11/04/2009 you made this catasgorical statement:...

"I also said that DM is NOT quietly negotiating. That is NOT there plan, they sue and then they negotiate. A recent change to the patent laws makes this the wise way to go."...

Now that is a catagorical statement. It professes to know of a recent change to the patent law which makes suing first and then negotiating "the wise way to go."...

I simply asked you to give us the specific change it the patent law, and you came back with the following diddy:...

"I simply remember that 'how a defendant is notified' became more important with a recent patent law change. If my recollection is correct and if the source I am remembering is correct then it would be BETTER for the plaintiff to file suit rather than send a letter."!?!??...

You question your own recollection and also seem to have question if your source was correct, but you presented this as FACT that there was a recent change in the patent Law which made which called for plaintiff to sue first and then ngotiate...

There is no such law change, and by your admission you know not of one...

TrIple HEARSAY statement such as yours are not conducive to positive discussion of issues facing EDIG investors who post on thus Forum...

GLTU...

Gil...